Scientific Committee
Our scientific review committee comprises globally recognized scholars who ensure rigorous academic review.
All papers submitted to the conference undergo rigorous double-blind peer review conducted by an international panel of expert academics. Our reviewers are drawn from leading universities and research institutes worldwide.
40+
Expert Reviewers
25+
Countries
100%
Double-Blind
<4 Wks
Avg. Decision
Review Process
All submissions are reviewed under a strict double-blind protocol in adherence with COPE guidelines.
-
01
Submission
Author submits through the online portal. Manuscript is assigned a reference number.
-
02
Desk Review
Editor checks compliance with submission guidelines before sending for peer review.
-
03
Peer Review
Two independent expert reviewers evaluate the manuscript. Neither party knows the other's identity.
-
04
Decision
Editor compiles reviews and issues one of: Accept, Minor Revision, Major Revision, or Reject.
-
05
Revision
Where revisions are required, the author has 14 days to resubmit an updated manuscript.
-
06
Final Decision
Revised paper is re-evaluated by the original reviewers before a final editorial decision is made.
Committee Members
Committee members will be announced shortly.
Open Call
Apply to Join the Scientific Committee
We are seeking qualified academics with a strong publication record to serve as peer reviewers. Reviewers are acknowledged in all printed proceedings.
Apply to Review- Hold a PhD in a relevant academic discipline
- Have a minimum of 3 publications in peer-reviewed journals
- Commit to reviewing 2–3 manuscripts per submission cycle
- Agree to comply with COPE double-blind review guidelines